In the good old days when I spent most of my time as a practicing biomedical research scientist it was pretty clear to me what qualified as a scholarly communication. Such communications consisted of submissions of presentations to meetings of scholarly academic societies; submissions and presentations of original research to journals; presenting seminars; and writing the occasional review articles, book chapters, or even books. Now that I spend much of my time as a bioethicist it is no longer so clear to me. It is probably important to note that the uncertainty I feel about this is probably only partly attributable to the difference in discipline and may indeed be primarily due to the emergence of our modern-day online communications including the blogging and social media culture.
The communication you are reading now is a blog, only a blog, not a scholarly communication. Al least I am pretty sure that is the case. I cite no evidence. I reference lightly if at all. I write what I want. I am merely expressing my opinions. I am not really accountable to anyone for what I say here. I can write it in minutes or hours, not weeks or months. This all sounds to me that this is not a scholarly publication. Yet I have read in both blogs and on social media such as facebook and twitter people raising questions about the distinction. (Please note that I did not reference my statement, further evidence that this is not a scholarly publication.) I have seen questions which ask how are blogs and scholarly writings different if indeed they are different. I have seen writers ask if blogs should be included in one’s Curriculum Vita as a publication. Please note that this will not be posted in my Curriculum Vita because it is, again, only a blog.
The Alden March Bioethics Institute offers a Master of Science in Bioethics, a Doctorate of Professional Studies in Bioethics, and Graduate Certificates in Clinical Ethics and Clinical Ethics Consultation. For more information on AMBI's online graduate programs, please visit our website.